Trinity: a Polytheistic Fiction(200+ Ways the Quran Corrects the Bible).
Note:
Millions of Christians believe in the "Holy Trinity" on faith. Through this formula, they transformed Jesus, the son of Mary, into the "Son of God", and even God himself. However, history, logic, arithmetic, the Old Testament, and the New Testament prove the contrary: Jesus was not Lord; he was a creation of God like Adam was.
The doctrine of the Trinity is found in many pagan religions. Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu are the Trinitarian godhead in Indian religions. In Egypt there was the triad of Osiris, Isis and Horus; in Babylon, Ishtar, Sin, Shamash; in Arabia, Al-Laat, Al-Uzza, and Manat. The Encyclopedia Britannica (1975) gives a critical piece of information:
"Trinity, the doctrine of God taught by Christians that asserts that God is one in essence but three in 'person,' Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the scheme in the Old Testament: 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord' (Deuteronomy 6:4 )"
This information on the Trinity contradicts the faith of most Christians. They believe that Matthew 28:19 and John1:1 and some other verses clearly provide a basis for the doctrine of the Trinity. However, the New Catholic Encyclopedia (1967 edition, Vol: 14, p. 306) acknowledges that the Trinity doctrine does not exist in the Old Testament, and that it was formulated three centuries after Jesus. The Athanasian Creed formulated a polytheistic doctrine with the following words: "We worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance (Prayer Book, 1662). The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three Gods but one God." It is unanimously accepted that the doctrine of the Trinity is the product of the Nicene Conference (325 AC). The renowned Christian commentator Easton explains Trinity in one paragraph:
"Trinity: a word not found in Scripture, but used to express the doctrine of the unity of God as subsisting in three distinct Persons. This word is derived from the Gr. trias, first used by Theophilus (A.D. 168-183), or from the Lat. trinitas, first used by Tertullian (A.D. 220), to express this doctrine. The propositions involved in the doctrine are these: 1. That God is one, and that there is but one God (De 6:4; 1Ki 8:60; Isa 44:6; Mr 12:29; Joh 10:30). 2. That the Father is a distinct divine Person (hypostasis, subsistentia, persona, suppositum intellectuale), distinct from the Son and the Holy Spirit. 3. That Jesus Christ was truly God, and yet was a Person distinct from the Father and the Holy Spirit. 4. That the Holy Spirit is also a distinct divine Person."
Questions such as, "How could the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit be totally different and yet participate in the one undivided nature of God?" have given Christian scholars a hard time for centuries. To explain the nature of the Trinity, they have written volumes of books full of interpretations and speculations ending up with a divine paradox, or a divine mystery, which amount to no more than holy gobbledygook. So, it is not worthwhile to question the meaning of the Trinity further as the answer, ultimately, will be that it is a divine mystery which cannot be understood. Instead, we will question the compatibility of the doctrine with the Bible.
The Trinity is not taught in any of the thirty-nine books of the Old Testament. None of the Biblical prophets, such as Noah, Abraham, Moses, David mention the Trinity. To the contrary, they emphasized God's oneness (Deuteronomy 4:39 ; 6:4; 32:39. Exodus 20: 2-3. 1 Samuel 2:2 . 1 Kings 8:60 , Isaiah 42:8 ; 45:5).
The concept of the Trinity was fabricated within several centuries through gradual distortion and gradual exaggeration of the powers of the hero. Initially, there were many Christian communities rejecting the idea of the deity of Jesus, such as the Ebonites, but ultimately, the followers of St. Paul were victorious against the true supporters of Jesus, and they used force, occasionally in a very cruel way, to impose their authority.
The Bible contains many verses rejecting the doctrine of the Trinity. For instance, according to the Bible, we all can become the children of God, that is, the followers of God, thereby contradicting the idea that Jesus was the only one (Matthew 5:9 ; 6:14, Luke 20:36 ; John 8:47 , 1 John 5:18,19 ). According to the Bible, Jesus rebukes someone calling him "Good," by asking him rhetorically, "Why do you call me good?" and then answering the question, "Only God is truly good!" (Mark 10:18-19 ). Furthermore, to those who asked about the time of the end of the world, Jesus rejected the concept of the Trinity, which equates God with Jesus: "No one knows about that day or hour, not even the controllers in heaven, nor I myself, but, only the Father." (Mark 13:32 ) If Jesus were Lord, as St. Paul's followers assert, how could he not know the future? Many verses in the Gospel reject the concept of the deity of Jesus and promote strict monotheism. "Jesus replied, 'The one that says, 'Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is the one and only God. And you must love him with all your heart and soul and mind and strength.'" (Mark 12:29 ). Also, see 4:10; 6:24, Mark 10:18 , Luke 18:19 .
Another verse quoting from the Old Testament depicts Jesus as a Servant of God (Matthew 12:17-18 ). Isn't there a difference between God and the Servant of God? The polytheist Christians will find it very difficult to answer this simple question and they will seek refuge in their dark cave called "mystery." They will do anything to continue their belief in the fabricated doctrine of the "Pharisee-son-of-a-Pharisee" as their prime holy teaching (Matthew 16:11-12 ; 23:13; Luke 12:1-2 ; Acts 23:6 ). Jesus, according to the Gospels, was a "messenger of God" (Matthew 21:11,46 ; Luke 7:16 ; 24:19; John 4:19 ; 6:14), yet to Jesus-worshipping polytheists there is not much difference between the "messenger of God" and "God." If you bring them a dictionary and demand some rational justification, you will hit the wall of "mystery." In St. Paul’s Wonderland, Biblical words either do not have much meaning, or they mutate and transform in many incredible ways. Whether Jesus saw God or not, might be another important questing in refuting the Trinity, but verse John 1:18 provides two contradictory answers in two different versions.
The Trinity is not a logical or rational theory; its absurdity can be expressed in mathematical terms as 1=1+1+1. Although it is logically and mathematically false, it survives in the imaginations of people who have faith in the wishful thinking of idolized clergymen. One may find hundreds of Biblical verses rejecting the deity of Jesus and still be unable to convince a Christian inflicted with this virus. The doctrine is based on revering and consecrating a clear logical contradiction: A being who was a creature, a human being, and at the same time a non-human being, a creator, the creator! It ignores the fact that nothing can be both a man and a God, according to the very definition of the word "man" and "God." God is not created, but man is created; God does not need food, but man does; God is eternal, but man is mortal; the eternal cannot be mortal. So on and so forth. The First Cause, or the uncreated cannot be, at the same time, created.
Therefore, the doctrine of the Trinity is a virus that attacks and destroys the immunity system of the brain first. A person who received such a virus "on faith," by blindly following the teaching of a particular church or the proximate crowd, will not be healed by the rules of logic, mathematics, history, archeological findings, or scientific evidence. Nothing can sober them up from their intoxication. The virus is made even more invincible by the first planter of the seed of this virus, Paul, who boasted to his "flock" that he becomes everything and anything, all things to all men just to win them over(1 Corinthians 9:20-22 ):
"But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed." (Galatians 1:8-9 ).
No wonder, the idol-carver Pharisee-the-son-of-a-Pharisee has plenty of contempt for those who reason, and wrote the most impressive eulogy for foolishness and packaged it as part of the "gospel" together with an invincible bug against reason, evidence, and even God's controllers and messengers. Tertullian, the one who gave birth to the doctrine of the Trinity, wrote one of the fanciest defenses for dogmatism, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, that later gave fruit to indulgences, inquisition, witch-hunts, crusades, and many other tragedies. Tertullian tried to banish reason through lousy reasoning:
"These are human and demonic doctrines, engendered for itching ears by the ingenuity of that worldly wisdom which the Lord called foolishness, choosing the foolish things of the world to put philosophy to shame. For worldly wisdom culminates in philosophy with its rash interpretation of God's nature and purpose. It is philosophy that supplies the heresies with their equipment… After Jesus Christ we have no need of speculation, after the Gospel no need of research. When we come to believe, we have no desire to believe anything else; for we begin by believing that there is nothing else which we have to believe."
Ironically, a handful of verses are abused to justify the Trinity, and ALL of them are questionable. For instance, many Christian scholars acknowledge that the crucial word, "only begotten" in John 1:14,18 and John 3:16,18 does not exist in the original manuscripts. The phrase "son of God," through various versions, and translation of translations mutated into "the only begotten Son of God." The difference in the number of words is small, but in theology, the difference is as big as the difference between monotheism and polytheism.
Many Western theologians and historians have come to the conclusion that today's Christianity is the product of St. Paul, not (J)esu(s). Here are a few of those books investigating the origin of today's Christianity: The Mythmaker: Paul and Invention of Christianity, Hyam Maccoby, Barnes and Noble, 1986. When Jesus Became God: The Epic Fight over Christ's Divinity in the Last Days of Rome, Richard Rubenstein, Harvest/HBJ Book, 2000. Who wrote the Bible?, Richard E. Friedman, Harper San Francisco, 1997. The Doctrine of the Trinity: Christianity's Self-Inflicted Wound, Sir Anthony Buzzard and Charles Hunting, University Press of America, 1998. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, Bart D. Ehrman, HarperSanFrancisco, 2005. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament, Bart D. Ehrman, Oxford University Press, 1996. Lost Scriptures: Books That Did Not Make It into the New Testament, Bart D. Ehrman, Oxford University Press, 2003. Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament, Jason Beduhn and Jason David Beduhn, University Press of America, 2003. We also recommend the following books: Is the Bible God's Word?, Ahmed Deedat, African Islamic Mission Publication, 1990. Jesus: Myths & Message, Lisa Spray, Universal Unity, 1992. Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist, Dan Barker, Freedom From Religion Foundation, 1994. 200+ Ways the Quran Corrects the Bible, Mohamed Ghounem, MNMC, 2004. 19 Questions for Christians, Edip Yuksel, the revised version is in publication.
Also, see:📍 2:59; 3:45;x4:11; 5:72; 7:162; 19:36.
(edip)
(📍4:171
Also, see 2:59; 3:45; x4:11; 5:72; 7:162; 19:36
.
২:৫৯
فَبَدَّلَ الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا قَوْلًا غَيْرَ الَّذِي قِيلَ لَهُمْ فَأَنْزَلْنَا عَلَى الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا رِجْزًا مِنَ السَّمَاءِ بِمَا كَانُوا يَفْسُقُونَ
কিন্তু যালিমসকলে সেই কথাক আন কথাৰ দ্বাৰা পৰিবৰ্তন কৰিলে যিটো সিহঁতক কোৱা হৈছিল, ফলত আমি যালিমসকলৰ প্ৰতি সিহঁতৰ অবাধ্যতাৰ কাৰণে আকাশৰ পৰা শাস্তি অৱতীৰ্ণ কৰিলো ।
.
৩:৪৫
إِذْ قَالَتِ الْمَلَائِكَةُ يَا مَرْيَمُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُبَشِّرُكِ بِكَلِمَةٍ مِنْهُ اسْمُهُ الْمَسِيحُ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ وَجِيهًا فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالْآخِرَةِ وَمِنَ الْمُقَرَّبِينَ
স্মৰণ কৰা, যেতিয়া ফিৰিস্তাসকলে ক’লে, ‘হে মাৰইয়াম! নিশ্চয় আল্লাহে আপোনাক তেওঁৰ তৰফৰ পৰা এটা কলিমাৰ সুসংবাদ দিছে। যাৰ নাম মছীহ, মাৰইয়ামৰ পুত্ৰ ঈছা, তেওঁ পৃথিৱী আৰু পৰকালত সন্মানিত আৰু সান্নিধ্যপ্ৰাপ্তসকলৰ অন্যতম হ’ব।
.
৫:৭২
لَقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ الْمَسِيحُ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ ۖ وَقَالَ الْمَسِيحُ يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ اعْبُدُوا اللَّهَ رَبِّي وَرَبَّكُمْ ۖ إِنَّهُ مَنْ يُشْرِكْ بِاللَّهِ فَقَدْ حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ الْجَنَّةَ وَمَأْوَاهُ النَّارُ ۖ وَمَا لِلظَّالِمِينَ مِنْ أَنْصَارٍ
যিসকলে কয়, ‘মছিহ ইবনে মাৰইয়ামেই হৈছে আল্লাহ’, অৱশ্যে সিহঁতে কুফৰী কৰিছে। অথচ মছিহে কৈছে, ‘হে ইছৰাঈলৰ সন্তানসকল! তোমালোকে সেই আল্লাহৰ ইবাদত কৰা যিজন মোৰ ৰব আৰু তোমালোকৰো ৰব’। নিশ্চয় যিয়ে আল্লাহৰ লগত অংশীদাৰ স্থাপন কৰে আল্লাহে তাৰ ওপৰত জান্নাত হাৰাম কৰি দিছে আৰু তাৰ ঠিকনা হ’ব জাহান্নাম; আৰু যালিমসকলৰ বাবে কোনো সহায়কাৰী নাই।
.
৭:১৬২
فَبَدَّلَ الَّذِينَ ظَلَمُوا مِنْهُمْ قَوْلًا غَيْرَ الَّذِي قِيلَ لَهُمْ فَأَرْسَلْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ رِجْزًا مِنَ السَّمَاءِ بِمَا كَانُوا يَظْلِمُونَ
তথাপিও সিহঁতৰ মাজত যিসকল যালিম আছিল সিহঁতক যি কোৱা হৈছিল, তাৰ পৰিবৰ্তে সিহঁতে আন কথা ক’লে। সেয়ে আমি আকাশৰ পৰা সিহঁতৰ প্ৰতি শাস্তি পঠালো, কাৰণ সিহঁতে অন্যায় কৰিছিল।
.
১৯:৩৬
وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ رَبِّي وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ ۚ هَٰذَا صِرَاطٌ مُسْتَقِيمٌ
নিশ্চয় আল্লাহেই মোৰ ৰব্ব আৰু তোমালোকৰো ৰব্ব; সেয়ে তোমালোকে তেওঁৰ ইবাদত কৰা, এইটোৱেই সৰল পথ।
... arranged... syedraf....
Comments
Post a Comment